Good eye Mike.
I'm confused--if not intoxicated at the moment--is there a dangling modifier I am missing?
They've since changed the headline, but it originally talked about the nominee favoring strong anti-decency fines, rather than strong anti-indecency fines.Me, I'm in favor of decency, but uncomfortable with the anti-indecency crusaders.It does tend to make the head spin.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
3 comments:
Good eye Mike.
I'm confused--if not intoxicated at the moment--is there a dangling modifier I am missing?
They've since changed the headline, but it originally talked about the nominee favoring strong anti-decency fines, rather than strong anti-indecency fines.
Me, I'm in favor of decency, but uncomfortable with the anti-indecency crusaders.
It does tend to make the head spin.
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.